User login

We offer our registered users tailored information, free online courses and exclusive content.

You have an old EXCEMED account ...

Our platform has been renewed. All users registered at any of the old websites are kindly requested to reset their password. Why is this?

... or you lost your password?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Recent advances in differentiated thyroid cancer

Recent advances in differentiated thyroid cancer

Data on the incidence of individual cancers places thyroid cancer as one which is increasing at one of the most rapid rates.1,2 This is partially due to the widespread use of highly sensitive diagnostic imaging techniques, particularly high-resolution neck ultrasonography. A significant number of cases are discovered incidentally during imaging of the neck or chest areas for unrelated reasons.1,3,4 Most of these cases are small tumours that carry excellent prognosis even when treated conservatively.5,6 This has led to a paradigm shift in the management of these tumours,7 alongside advances in the molecular understanding of thyroid cancer pathogenesis aiding in their assessment and risk stratification.8,9 This article briefly discusses the modern approach to management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in view of these advances.

Classification of differentiated thyroid cancer

For a long time, DTC has been classified into two main categories: papillary (PTC) and follicular (FTC) subtypes, with several variants described in the last decades.10,11 In the 2017 World Health Organization Classification, 15 subtypes of DTC were described.12 One new entity is the non-invasive follicular tumour with papillary-like structures (NIFTP).13 This variant is a follicular tumour that has the nuclear features of PTC but is encapsulated and non-invasive.13,14 These features have suggested that this variant is not cancer and it has subsequently been reclassified as a benign thyroid tumour. Most cases with this variant were previously classified as follicular variant PTC. This new classification was based on critical review of a series of cases, comparing these tumours with another series of tumours with angio-invasive and capsular invasive features. On long-term follow up, none of the NIFTP cases developed local or distant recurrence nor were associated with mortality.13 FTC is classified into 3 variants: 1) minimally invasive with only capsular but no vascular invasion; 2) encapsulated angio-invasive subtype with some vascular but no capsular invasion; and 3) widely invasive FTC with significant vascular and capsular invasion.12,15 Hurthle cell cancer, for a long time considered to be a variant of FTC, is now considered as a separate entity as it has significant distinct molecular and histopathological features from FTC.15 Finally, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) is also listed as a distinct entity based on the recently described Turin criteria, with an intermediately aggressive course between anaplastic thyroid cancer and well-differentiated thyroid cancer.16


The two widely used staging system are the American Joint Cancer Committee/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer TNM staging system for thyroid cancer, which estimates the risk of mortality, and the American Thyroid Association staging system which estimates the risk of recurrence.7,17 The TNM staging system places major emphasis on the age of the patient, and invasiveness and spread to locoregional lymph nodes and distant sites.17 The 8th edition of the TNM staging system has raised the age limit from 45 years to 55 years and does not consider minimal extrathyroidal extension and regional lymph node metastasis as staging criteria.17,18 With these modifications to the staging system, many patients are expected to be down-staged and only 5-10% of cases will be in stage III or IV and associated with a higher risk of mortality.19 The staging system proposed by the ATA in 200920 was based on limited data at that time and was more of an expert opinion. It has been validated in a number of studies and was used as the basis of the 2015 ATA guidelines with further modifications based on available evidence.7 In addition, a number of other histopathological features and molecular markers have been suggested to refine staging and the risk of tumour recurrence.7

ATA guidelines proposed a unified disease status and response to therapy based on serum thyroglobulin, thyroglobulin autoantibodies and imaging studies.7 After initial treatment, these data would place patients in one of four categories: excellent response, biochemically incomplete, structurally incomplete or an indeterminate response.7 The ATA also emphasize the newly introduced concept of dynamic staging in which the status of the disease varies over time and may change from one status to another.7


Initial surgical management

As most cases of low-to-intermediate risk DTC have an excellent prognosis, the question has been posed as to whether a more conservative management approach could be followed.7 This is exemplified by the extreme case of optional active surveillance instead of surgery for patients with small, subcentimeter, well-differentiated PTC.21,22 Risk for well-selected patients with this type of tumour is minimal and data from Japan and the United States are consistent in showing that this approach is an acceptable alternative to surgery in patients with PTC of 1.0–1.5 cm in size without extrathyroidal extension, lymph node or distant metastasis.21-23 In addition, intra-thyroid DTC up to 4.0 cm without evidence of locoregional or distant metastasis or aggressive histopathology can be treated with hemithyroidectomy instead of the previously recommended total thyroidectomy.7,24 Prophylactic central lymph node dissection is not recommended for the majority of cases, especially those in low-to-intermediate ATA risk categories.7

Radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation

Similarly to the recommended conservative surgical approach, the use of RAI for remnant ablation is recommended with caveats.25 There is no indication to administer RAI for patients with incomplete surgery (those who had undergone a hemithyroidectomy for low risk tumours). Similarly, RAI is not recommended for subcentimeter tumours. Low-risk patients who have undergone complete surgical therapy and have no evidence of disease on postoperative evaluation do not generally benefit from RAI ablation.7,25 For low and intermediate risk patients, serum thyroglobulin level 4–6 weeks after surgery provides reliable information about the future risk of disease. Post complete surgery patients with low serum thyroglobulin in the absence of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies and with no evidence of suspicious findings on ultrasonographic examination of the neck do not generally benefit from RAI.7 Only high risk patients are routinely prescribed adjuvant RAI or therapeutic therapy. Not only have the indications for RAI become limited, but also the recommended level of RAI administered is also becoming less.26 This is based on two large multicenter European clinical trials which showed that 30 mCi and 100 mCi with recombinant human TSH or with conventional thyroxine therapy withdrawal achieve similar ablation results.26,27

The conservative management approach extends to the level of TSH suppression following initial surgery with or without RAI.7 Suppression of TSH to <0.001 mU/L is recommended for high risk patients or those with residual or persistent cancer tissue (biochemically or structurally incomplete).7,28 For patients with an indeterminate status, mild suppression (TSH 0.1–0.5 Mu/L) is recommended.7 Patients who respond well do not need TSH suppression and it is recommended that their TSH level should be in the lower half of the normal range (0.5–2.0 mU/L).7

Management of progressive metastatic RAI-refractory disease  

Until a few years ago, patients with metastatic progressive disease had limited treatment options and would usually succumb to their disease.29,30 Over the last decade, there has been significant progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of DTC, and testing and introduction of new therapeutic agents.31 Two multikinase inhibitors, sorafinib and lenvatinib, have been approved for the management of RAI-refractory progressive metastatic DTC – with both drugs shown to significantly improve the progression-free survival and quality of life of patients.32,33 Other drugs are being tested in phase II and III trials. Selumatinib and dabrafenib are specific BRAF inhibitors and have been shown to be effective in BRAF+ metastatic DTC. These drugs may have a role in redifferentiating thyroid cancer cells so they become less aggressive and absorb more radioactive iodine.34,35


Accumulated clinical and molecular data over the last decade have significantly impacted the clinical practice and management of DTC. Considering the excellent prognosis of most cases of DTC, there has been a major paradigm shift towards more conservative approaches with less surgery, more selective use of radioactive iodine for ablation and less thyroid hormone suppression. Better understanding of the biology and natural course of some forms of DTC has led to their reclassification to benign tumours and sub-classification of others to specific subtypes with implications for their management. The staging systems have been refined to more accurately assess the risk of recurrence and mortality. Finally, better understanding of the molecular basis of DTC has led to the introduction, testing and use of multikinase inhibitors as new therapeutic agents that have significantly changed the outlook for a small but important group of patients with progressive RAI-refractory DTC


1.         Hughes DT, et al. The most commonly occurring papillary thyroid cancer in the United States is now a microcarcinoma in a patient older than 45 years. Thyroid. Mar 2011;21(3):231-236.

2.         Kitahara CM, Sosa JA. The changing incidence of thyroid cancer. Nature reviews. Endocrinology. Nov 2016;12(11):646-653.

3.         Nishimori H, et al. Incidental thyroid “PETomas”: clinical significance and novel description of the self-resolving variant of focal FDG-PET thyroid uptake. Can J Surg. 2011;54:83.

4.         Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:226.

5.         Baudin E, et al. Microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland: the Gustave-Roussy Institute experience. Cancer. 1998;83:553.

6.         Hay ID, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008;144:980.

7.         Haugen BR, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. Jan 2016;26(1):1-133.

8.         Niemeier LA, et al. A combined molecular-pathologic score improves risk stratification of thyroid papillary microcarcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:2069.

9.         Papaleontiou M, Haymart MR. New insights in risk stratification of differentiated thyroid cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. Jan 2014;26(1):1-7.

10.       Baloch ZW, et al. Encapsulated classic and follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparative clinicopathologic study. Endocr Pract. 2010;16:952.

11.       Kazaure HS, et al. Aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer: incidence, characteristics and predictors of survival among 43,738 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1874.

12.       WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. Geneva 2017.

13.       Nikiforov YE, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: A paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA oncology. Aug 1 2016;2(8):1023-1029.

14.       Haugen BR, et al. American Thyroid Association Guidelines on the Management of Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Task Force Review and Recommendation on the Proposed Renaming of Encapsulated Follicular Variant Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Without Invasion to Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features. Thyroid. Apr 2017;27(4):481-483.

15.       Grani G, et al. Follicular thyroid cancer and Hurthle cell carcinoma: challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Oct 25 2017.

16.       Volante M, et al. Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the Turin proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria and an algorithmic diagnostic approach. Am J Surg Pathol. Aug 2007;31(8):1256-1264.

17.       Nixon IJ, et al. An international multi-institutional validation of age 55 years as a cutoff for risk stratification in the AJCC/UICC staging system for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. Mar 2016;26(3):373-380.

18.       Kim TH, et al. Prognostic value of the eighth edition AJCC TNM classification for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Oral oncology. Aug 2017;71:81-86.

19.       Lamartina L, et al. Recent advances in managing differentiated thyroid cancer [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. Vol 72018.

20.       Cooper DS, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. Nov 2009;19(11):1167-1214.

21.       Ito Y, et al. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg. Jan 2010;34(1):28-35.

22.       Tuttle RM, et al. Natural history and tumor volume kinetics of papillary thyroid cancers during active surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 1 2017;143(10):1015-1020.

23.       Oda H, et al. Incidences of unfavorable events in the management of low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid by active surveillance versus immediate surgery. Thyroid. Jan 2016;26(1):150-155.

24.       Macedo FI, Mittal VK. Total thyroidectomy versus lobectomy as initial operation for small unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. Jun 2015;24(2):117-122.

25.       Lamartina L, et al. Low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer and radioiodine remnant ablation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. May 2015;100(5):1748-1761.

26.       Schlumberger M, et al. Strategies of radioiodine ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. May 3 2012;366(18):1663-1673.

27.       Mallick U, et al. Ablation with low-dose radioiodine and thyrotropin alfa in thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1674.

28.       Alba M, et al. Levothyroxine therapy in preventing nodular recurrence after hemithyroidectomy: a retrospective study. J Endocrinol Invest. Apr 2009;32(4):330-334.

29.       Durante C, et al. Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892.

30.       Hay ID, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma managed at the Mayo Clinic during six decades (1940–1999): temporal trends in initial therapy and long-term outcome in 2444 consecutively treated patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:879.

31.       Haugen BR, Sherman SI. Evolving approaches to patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Rev. Jun 2013;34(3):439-455.

32.       Brose MS, et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Jul 26 2014;384(9940):319-328.

33.       Schlumberger M, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 12 2015;372(7):621-630.

34.       Cabanillas ME, et al. BRAF inhibitors: experience in thyroid cancer and general review of toxicity. Hormones & cancer. Feb 2015;6(1):21-36.

35.       Ho AL, et al. Selumetinib-enhanced radioiodine uptake in advanced thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 14 2013;368(7):623-632.


Ali Saeed Alzahrani

Scientist and Head Molecular Endocrinology Section
Department of Molecular Oncology
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Consultant Endocrinologist
Department of Medicine
AlFaisal University
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Professor of Medicine and Endocrinology
AlFaisal University
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
thyroid cancer